<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Bankwatch</provider_name><provider_url>https://bankwatch.blogactiv.eu</provider_url><author_name>Sven Haertig-Tokarz</author_name><author_url>https://bankwatch.blogactiv.eu/author/bankwatch/</author_url><title>Montenegro&#039;s Pljevlja coal plant is running out of time to secure financing</title><html>&lt;strong&gt;The Czech daily Hospodarske Noviny (English: &quot;Economic Newspaper&quot;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://archiv.ihned.cz/c1-65448090-cez-ztraci-projekt-za-miliardy&quot;&gt;is reporting today&lt;/a&gt; that the Czech Export Bank (CEB) and export insurance agency EGAP may not be be able to finance the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bankwatch.org/our-work/projects/pljevlja-ii-lignite-power-plant-montenegro&quot;&gt;Pljevlja II lignite power plant in Montenegro&lt;/a&gt; due to new OECD rules entering force on 1 January 2017.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;em&gt;by Hugo Charat, cross-posted from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bankwatch.org/news-media/blog&quot;&gt;Bankwatch blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

The two which have supported several fossil fuel power plants abroad over the last twenty years, already burned their fingers on the Poljarnaja gas-fired power plant in the Russian sub-Arctic Siberia where they &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.radio.cz/en/section/business/czech-building-company-psg-withdraws-from-major-russian-contract&quot;&gt;lost 5.9 billion Czech crowns&lt;/a&gt; (nearly 220 million EUR). Also a CZK 12 billion loan for the Yunus Emre coal plant in Turkey is facing a range of problems and postponements and most recently the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.radio.cz/en/section/business/hn-turkish-coup-attempt-could-lead-to-czk-12-billion-loss-for-cr&quot;&gt;arrests of several executives&lt;/a&gt; of Naksan, the mother company of the Turkish project promoter, in the aftermath of the failed coup in Turkey this year.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://bankwatch.org/news-media/blog/montenegrin-power-plant-feasible-only-creative-accounting&quot;&gt;Bankwatch analysis shows&lt;/a&gt; that claims of Pljevlja II&#039;s feasibility are based on creative accounting, so there&#039;s no reason to believe that CEB and EGAP would do any better this time. Seen in this light, the OECD rules are an opportunity, not a threat, for the CEB and EGAP to leave this climate-damaging and uneconomic project well alone.

&lt;strong&gt;Read more about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bankwatch.org/our-work/projects/pljevlja-ii-lignite-power-plant-montenegro&quot;&gt;Pljevlja power plant&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://bankwatch.org/campaign/coal&quot;&gt;other planned coal installations in the Balkans&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;</html><type>rich</type><thumbnail_url>https://bankwatch.blogactiv.eu/files/2016/09/Pljevlja-view-150x150.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>150</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>150</thumbnail_height></oembed>